OnlyMovHow Long Should a Blog Post Be?
By OnlyMov Editorial Team · · Editorial policy
The honest answer: as long as the topic needs and not a word more. But that answer hides real patterns — certain lengths consistently work for certain jobs, and both too short and too padded carry costs. Here are the working numbers, and the reasoning to override them.
Free tool for this task
Skip the manual work — use Word Counter to do this instantly.
The working numbers by post type
- News and updates: 300–600 words — the value is speed and the fact itself
- Standard blog posts: 800–1,200 words — one topic, properly covered
- SEO guides targeting competitive keywords: 1,500–2,500 words — matching the depth that ranks
- Pillar and ultimate guides: 3,000+ — hub pages linking into a topic cluster
- Tutorials: exactly as long as the steps require; completeness beats length either way
These are medians of what succeeds, not requirements. A 600-word page that answers a question completely outranks a 2,000-word page that pads the same answer — increasingly so as search rewards satisfaction over volume.
Why long content often ranks — and when it doesn't
Studies keep finding first-page results averaging 1,400–2,000 words, but the causation is subtler than "long ranks": long posts tend to cover subtopics that match more queries, earn more links, and signal effort.
Length is a byproduct of coverage, not a goal. The failure mode is visible everywhere: recipe posts with 1,500 words of life story, "guides" that restate their heading three ways per section. Readers bounce, and bounces undo whatever the word count bought. Depth ranks; padding is depth's imitation, and search engines have gotten good at telling them apart.
Decide length by search intent
Before writing, search your target keyword and read what ranks:
- Quick-answer intent ("how many grams in an ounce") — ranking pages are short; write short
- Learning intent ("how to start a podcast") — ranking pages are comprehensive; match that coverage
- Comparison intent ("best podcast mics") — ranking pages are structured lists with detail per item
The SERP is telling you what satisfied searchers looked like. Write the length that fully serves the intent you see — then stop.
Structure matters more than length
A 2,000-word post is read as scannable chunks or not at all:
- Descriptive headings every 200–300 words — a reader scanning only headings should get the outline
- Short paragraphs — 2–4 sentences; mobile screens turn five sentences into a wall
- The answer early — give the core answer in the first section, depth after; readers who get value early stay for more, and search engines pull early answers into snippets
- Lists and tables where the content is genuinely list-shaped
Word count is what you check at the end — with a word counter — to confirm you're in a sane range for the job. It's a dashboard gauge, not a destination.
Step-by-step summary
- 1
Check the intent on the SERP
Search the keyword; note the depth and format of what ranks.
- 2
Outline full coverage of the intent
Subtopics the reader needs — no more. The outline sets the length.
- 3
Write, then cut padding
Everything that repeats or delays gets deleted, whatever it does to the count.
- 4
Verify range and structure
Word count in the sane range for the job; headings, short paragraphs, answer up front.
Frequently asked questions
- What is the minimum length for a blog post to rank?
- There is no hard minimum — pages under 300 words rank for queries they answer completely. The practical concern is coverage: if competitors cover subtopics you skip, they match queries you can't.
- Is 500 words enough for a blog post?
- For news, announcements, and narrow questions — yes. For competitive informational keywords, 500 words rarely covers what ranking pages cover. Let the SERP for your specific keyword decide, not a universal rule.
- Do readers actually read long posts?
- They scan them — which is fine. Structure for scanning (headings, short paragraphs, early answers) and a 2,500-word post serves both the skimmer who takes one section and the reader who takes it all.